0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.35	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.13/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.35	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.35	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.35	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:31:07 EDT 2022
0.13/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.48	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.20/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.48	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 120s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# sh2lt with pid 6565 completed with status 0
0.20/0.49	# Result found by sh2lt
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.20/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.20/0.49	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.20/0.49	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 480 seconds (480 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 260s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 49s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting new_bool_1 with 44s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Starting new_bool_2 with 44s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# new_ho_10 with pid 6571 completed with status 0
0.20/0.49	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.20/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.20/0.49	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.20/0.49	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.20/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 480 seconds (480 total)
0.20/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10 with 260s (1) cores
0.20/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# Proof found!
0.20/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, d: $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_0: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.20/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, epred1_1: $i > $i > $o).
0.20/0.49	thf(cTHM143_pme, conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > $i]:((~((d @ (X1 @ d)))<=(((d)=(^[X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i > $o]:((~((X3 @ (X1 @ X3)))&((X2)=(X1 @ X3)))))))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((X4)=(X5))<=((X1 @ X4)=(X1 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM143_pme)).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($i > $o) > $i]:(((![X9:$i]:(((d @ X9)<=>?[X3:$i > $o]:((~(X3 @ (X1 @ X3))&((X9)=(X1 @ X3))))))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X4)=(X1 @ X5))=>((X4)=(X5)))))=>~(d @ (X1 @ d))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM143_pme])])])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X11:$i, X13:$i > $o, X14:$i > $o, X15:$i > $o]:((((((~(epred1_1 @ X11 @ (esk1_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X11)))|~(d @ X11))&(((X11)=(esk1_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X11)))|~(d @ X11)))&((X13 @ (esk1_0 @ X13))|((X11)!=(esk1_0 @ X13))|(d @ X11)))&(((esk1_0 @ X14)!=(esk1_0 @ X15))|((X14)=(X15))))&(d @ (esk1_0 @ d)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o]:((((X3)=(X4))|((esk1_0 @ X3)!=(esk1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o, X16:$i, X4:$i > $o]:((((X3 @ X16)<=>(X4 @ X16))|((esk1_0 @ X3)!=(esk1_0 @ X4)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((~((epred1_1 @ X2 @ (esk1_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X2))))|~((d @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((X2)=(esk1_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X2)))|~((d @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ X2)|((esk1_0 @ X3)!=(esk1_0 @ X4))|~((X4 @ X2)))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((~((epred1_1 @ X2 @ X2))|~((d @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((epred1_1 @ (esk1_0 @ X3) @ X2)|~((d @ (esk1_0 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o]:((~((d @ (esk1_0 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (d @ (esk1_0 @ d)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.20/0.49	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.20/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.20/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 5
0.20/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
0.20/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 23
0.20/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.20/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 3
0.20/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 20
0.20/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
0.20/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 35
0.20/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
0.20/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 20
0.20/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.20/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 7
0.20/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 12
0.20/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.20/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.20/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
0.20/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
0.20/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 10
0.20/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.20/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 33
0.20/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
0.20/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.20/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
0.20/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.20/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 23
0.20/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1102
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.49	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.20/0.49	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.20/0.49	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.20/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1892 pages
0.20/0.49	
0.20/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.49	# User time                : 0.012 s
0.20/0.49	# System time              : 0.009 s
0.20/0.49	# Total time               : 0.021 s
0.20/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.20/0.49	EOF